| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Smith <dsmith@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] json pmda qa/1052 failing on Centos6.6 |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:08:33 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <55C15F12.8060408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <017301d0cc28$d7c78640$875692c0$@internode.on.net> <440072288.2807362.1438581950952.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55BFC26D.8040503@xxxxxxxxxx> <1889100767.3736026.1438652097204.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55C14FAF.9010100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <934995702.4411085.1438732642013.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55C15F12.8060408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | UDJqd9HdypzGw/sr5REriIZwr1c85Q== |
| Thread-topic: | json pmda qa/1052 failing on Centos6.6 |
----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> OK ... but if pmdajson is not built for RHEL6, shouldn't this be
> reflected in the open source PCP configurery for both RHEL6 and
> CentOS6.6? If this was the case, then I would not have the failure, I
> would not spend time trying to debug it and we'd have less email volume?
Yes, definitely. I asked the same question below, paragraph #2, but perhaps
it was misunderstood / overlooked / no-good-answer-exists / ...
http://pcp.io/pipermail/pcp/2015-August/007928.html
Upshot is, I don't know how best to test for it in configure.ac :)
cheers.
--
Nathan
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] json pmda qa/1052 failing on Centos6.6, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | qa/730 failing on ia64/SLES11, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] json pmda qa/1052 failing on Centos6.6, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] json pmda qa/1052 failing on Centos6.6, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |