pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates: QA for pmlogger - handle stale primary control an

To: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates: QA for pmlogger - handle stale primary control and socket files
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 03:29:16 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <55B84483.3080604@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <55B84483.3080604@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: 7WZKu1/7bial71C62Ff8bfHwSolgdA==
Thread-topic: pcp updates: QA for pmlogger - handle stale primary control and socket files
Hi Mark,

----- Original Message -----
> 
> new qa/808 will fail unless you have the earlier commit, see below.
> 
> Changes committed to git://pcp.io/markgw/pcp/pcp.git master
> 


I pushed some fixes to 280 and 430 that are related today - and those
made me wonder about the upgrade scenario.  Could you test the case
where we have a primary logger running from an older PCP (hardlink'd)
and upgrade?  Its not clear if that process will go smoothly now.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>