| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Derived Metrics with rate() |
| From: | Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 02 Jul 2015 09:04:15 +0300 |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5590DD7B.4000808@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Red Hat |
| References: | <558BAC86.2090005@xxxxxxxxxx> <00e801d0b124$8b825d60$a2871820$@internode.on.net> <5590DD7B.4000808@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
Hi, On 2015-06-29 08:54, Marko Myllynen wrote: > On 2015-06-28 00:59, Ken McDonell wrote: > >> I don't think avqsz is correct. read_rawactive and write_rawactive measure >> time during which disk requests are being serviced ... these are in units >> of milliseconds, so you need to divide by 1000 to get close to the sar >> numbers. > > I couldn't figure out how to match exactly with sar numbers and this was > at least reacting the same way as sar's avgqu-sz (I should mentioned > this in my earlier email). I tried this one more time and I think the earlier mentioned formula is as close as possible to sar numbers, there's a bit of deviation but the same can be seen with pmiostat as well, dividing by 1000 would be wrong. Thanks, -- Marko Myllynen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates - PCP_DERIVED_CONFIG now a $PATH-style list with dir traversal, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] python3 woes on f22, David Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | pcp updates - PCP_DERIVED_CONFIG now a $PATH-style list with dir traversal, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Derived Metrics with rate(), Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |