pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] qa/1024 and disk partitions/docker indom issues

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] qa/1024 and disk partitions/docker indom issues
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 18:36:10 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <005b01d0b05d$0a16fc30$1e44f490$@internode.on.net>
References: <005b01d0b05d$0a16fc30$1e44f490$@internode.on.net>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AdCwXHFFawHrywB2QwKnpXGKBpvQ1KbIj+jR
Thread-topic: qa/1024 and disk partitions/docker indom issues
Hi Ken,

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> Is this expected?
> 
> I have a fix for 1024 that maps the instance ids to the constant "N" and
> sorts the list of instances in each block of pminfo output ... I just want
> to check this is expected before I commit.

Thanks - yes, thats the correct fix.  For the purposes of the test, its the
values that are important.  We could control the indom by ensuring the PMDA
does not use the host pmdacache files (which is whats biting us here, as it
shifts the assigned IDs based on the local host devices) ... but, theres no
real value in doing that - filtering would be simplest.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>