| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] qa/1024 and disk partitions/docker indom issues |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Jun 2015 18:36:10 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <005b01d0b05d$0a16fc30$1e44f490$@internode.on.net> |
| References: | <005b01d0b05d$0a16fc30$1e44f490$@internode.on.net> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | AdCwXHFFawHrywB2QwKnpXGKBpvQ1KbIj+jR |
| Thread-topic: | qa/1024 and disk partitions/docker indom issues |
Hi Ken, ----- Original Message ----- > [...] > Is this expected? > > I have a fix for 1024 that maps the instance ids to the constant "N" and > sorts the list of instances in each block of pminfo output ... I just want > to check this is expected before I commit. Thanks - yes, thats the correct fix. For the purposes of the test, its the values that are important. We could control the indom by ensuring the PMDA does not use the host pmdacache files (which is whats biting us here, as it shifts the assigned IDs based on the local host devices) ... but, theres no real value in doing that - filtering would be simplest. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Solaris build notes, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Derived Metrics with rate(), Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | qa/1024 and disk partitions/docker indom issues, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | pcp updates: merge dsmith (json pmda active/inactive instances, qa) + nathans (solaris build, rpm/deb uploads, pmdalinux units, atop) + kenj (postfix pmda, qa), Mark Goodwin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |