pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp fedora.spec review comments and patch

To: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp fedora.spec review comments and patch
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 23:05:24 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <557A4A95.9010704@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <55798552.6040707@xxxxxxxxxx> <87zj46j8qc.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <5579F1D9.2070008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1702165106.16244985.1434076585036.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <557A4A95.9010704@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: snflS7U0L2zjP3FZKhjZl+GSuIPC2Q==
Thread-topic: pcp fedora.spec review comments and patch

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> further down the track - I think we're going to have to change
> how the the fedora spec works - the packaging lists need to be
> generated by the build rather that by convoluted scriptlets in the

+1 ... being able to use these targets/lists for different types
of packages (like debs) would be handy as well.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>