pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp fedora.spec review comments and patch

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp fedora.spec review comments and patch
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 22:36:25 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5579F1D9.2070008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <55798552.6040707@xxxxxxxxxx> <87zj46j8qc.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <5579F1D9.2070008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: IchQTvtOiSpeurg3+MkrcPm1Dglyxg==
Thread-topic: pcp fedora.spec review comments and patch
Hi guys,

----- Original Message -----
> On 12/06/15 06:22, Lukas Berk wrote:
> > ...  The other major
> > difference is where the various config files should be shipped (such as
> > pmieconf/ and pmlogconf/ files, that coincide with no split-pmdas).
> > Makepkgs ships them in the pmda-foo packages, and fedora ships them in
> > the base pcp package.  Which do people think is correct?
> 
> If possible, these should be in the base PCP package.

I've update pcp.spec.in to handle this.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>