pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates: merge kenj (qa updates)

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates: merge kenj (qa updates)
From: Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:48:22 -0400
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5577E4AC.5060000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Ken McDonell's message of "Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:18:04 +1000")
References: <5576DA95.1090705@xxxxxxxxxx> <55776956.1050304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87h9qgmhhl.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <5577E4AC.5060000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
Hi Ken,

The latest run[1] (after your 491 patches were merged by mark) only have
two failures now.

Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 578 - no idea
>
> is this a fd count mismatch error?  if so, I am seeing this also and I
> think it is a test stability (not code quality) issue, but it would be
> nice to have a real diagnosis

Yes. it's mismatching errors.

>> 823 - this one has been failing me for awhile
>
> "No worthy mechs"?  If so, check that the cyrus-sasl-plain rpm is
> installed.  Recently added to the qa/admin/check-vm script and made
> the difference for me (thanks Nathan for the pointer that helped
> diagnose this).

No, as the stout from the check script describes, user not found
errors.  I saw that email and tried the rpm install trick, but that was
already installed.  Still failing.  I've even reinstalled the relavent
packages just to be sure.

>> 956 - not sure about this one either
> Same answer as 578 above.

Appears so, no longer failing, as with the two 10XX tests which the
fixes were pulled in last night.

Cheers,

Lukas

[1] - 
http://buildbot.pcp.io/builders/fedora/builds/106/steps/Run%20Testsuite/logs/stdio

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>