pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] proc pmda question

To: chandana@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] proc pmda question
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 22:23:47 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1433815973.23309.32.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1433811890.23309.20.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <845583066.14046059.1433813114755.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <1433815973.23309.32.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: igAo1EYBZUisgOmgAfq5jbgQDz2COA==
Thread-topic: proc pmda question

----- Original Message -----
> Hello Nathan,
> Thanks for your response. Unfortunately that did not work.

Wait, wha?  Can you paste command invocation & output please?  taa.

> I guess I
> will have to go down the SSL (or SASL) path.

Hmm, I would make sure the above works first (SASL auth uses some of
the same code paths as af_unix auth).

> Pity that SASL can't use
> SSH pub key.

Well, this is more due to the choice of libnss for crypto services on
our part I think.  AIUI, it would be possible to provide a libssl-
based implementation as well, that could use SSH keys - but, I've
not looked into it too deeply.

Certainly the way Dave wrote the code that uses libnss does allow for
alternative crypto variants to be plugged in, if someone wants to hack
on that...?

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>