| To: | chandana@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] proc pmda question |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Jun 2015 22:23:47 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1433815973.23309.32.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1433811890.23309.20.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <845583066.14046059.1433813114755.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <1433815973.23309.32.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | igAo1EYBZUisgOmgAfq5jbgQDz2COA== |
| Thread-topic: | proc pmda question |
----- Original Message ----- > Hello Nathan, > Thanks for your response. Unfortunately that did not work. Wait, wha? Can you paste command invocation & output please? taa. > I guess I > will have to go down the SSL (or SASL) path. Hmm, I would make sure the above works first (SASL auth uses some of the same code paths as af_unix auth). > Pity that SASL can't use > SSH pub key. Well, this is more due to the choice of libnss for crypto services on our part I think. AIUI, it would be possible to provide a libssl- based implementation as well, that could use SSH keys - but, I've not looked into it too deeply. Certainly the way Dave wrote the code that uses libnss does allow for alternative crypto variants to be plugged in, if someone wants to hack on that...? cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] proc pmda question, Chandana De Silva |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] proc pmda question, Chandana De Silva |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] proc pmda question, Chandana De Silva |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] proc pmda question, Chandana De Silva |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |