| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] PMIE : Using raw value for a counter |
| From: | Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 May 2015 11:11:47 +0300 |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <017601d08f55$28fd85c0$7af89140$@internode.on.net> |
| Organization: | Red Hat |
| References: | <1431663705.6445.46.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <017601d08f55$28fd85c0$7af89140$@internode.on.net> |
| Reply-to: | myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
Hi, On 2015-05-16 00:21, Ken McDonell wrote: > > I am struggling for a good name for the function to do this (I'd > prefer to use the same name for derived metrics and pmie). > > Something like value(x) or norate(x) would take an expression (x) > with counter semantics and return the current value of x without the > normal rate conversion. > > Votes for value() or norate() would be appreciated, as would > suggestions for a better name. I give positive votes for value() or raw() and negative votes for norate() and snapshot(). Thanks, -- Marko Myllynen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pcp Digest, Vol 82, Issue 37, Chandana De Silva |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Clear & Crisp image - Patent IP camera and NVR, Amilie-RYD Security |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PMIE : Using raw value for a counter, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Next by Thread: | pcp updates: merge Frank (smb build speedup) + kenj (linux PMDA Install, qa), Mark Goodwin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |