| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Bug 1109] fuzzy container hex-id naming leads to nondeterminism |
| From: | bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 15 May 2015 02:14:24 +0000 |
| Auto-submitted: | auto-generated |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <bug-1109-835@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/bugzilla/> |
| References: | <bug-1109-835@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/bugzilla/> |
|
Comment # 2
on bug 1109
from Frank Ch. Eigler
> Hmm. By design, what is supposed to be happening is the "fully qualified"
> name (once looked up via the docker fuzzy matching, just like the docker
> client tools do) is returned to the requesting PMDA, which can then use it
> as a unique identifier going forward in subsequent requests - rendering this
> a non-issue.
Even if this were done, it still makes the mapping non-deterministic,
because more than one container can match that substring; a client has
no way of knowing whether its choice was unique. Emulating the docker
client's apparent non-determinism is not obviously necessary.
We could instead say that the name matching is done exactly once (at
connection time), and fails if ambiguous.
You are receiving this mail because:
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] PCP Buidbot and Improving QA, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 1111] New: --container=NO_SUCH_CONTAINER succeeds, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | [Bug 1109] fuzzy container hex-id naming leads to nondeterminism, bugzilla-daemon |
| Next by Thread: | [Bug 1109] fuzzy container hex-id naming leads to nondeterminism, bugzilla-daemon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |