pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp-updates spin-rawhide, docs, pcp.spec.in fixes

To: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp-updates spin-rawhide, docs, pcp.spec.in fixes
From: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 10:03:36 +0300
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <878ud0kneb.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat
References: <878ud0kneb.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
Hi,

On 2015-05-08 01:56, Lukas Berk wrote:
> Author: Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>     Wrap pcp-pmda-rpm and pcp-gui with proper %if checks
>     
>     pcp-pmda-rpm and pcp-gui aren't built on some platforms,
>     wrapping them with proper checks so it doesn't fail on other platforms

now that you're working with packaging, are there any chances to
separate pmdumptext from pcp-gui so that fewer dependencies would be
pulled in when installing pmdumptext? ldd indicates that QtCore is
needed by pmdumptext (not sure why?) but otherwise pmdumptext has much
shorter list of DSO dependencies that pmchart so it might make sense to
separate them.

Thanks,

-- 
Marko Myllynen

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>