pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint

To: Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint
From: Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 13:39:51 -0400
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <554AFCE0.9010606@xxxxxxxxx> (Mark Goodwin's message of "Thu, 07 May 2015 15:49:20 +1000")
References: <87bnk0wzn5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <877ft59dmo.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <1565443824.10833179.1430459606977.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <87383c19uy.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <554843FC.9040109@xxxxxxxxxx> <87d22eyfut.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <55496FC7.8060600@xxxxxxxxx> <874mnpjs3u.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <554AD069.9060106@xxxxxxxxxx> <554AFCE0.9010606@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
Hey,

Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
> Lukas, what's the plan for deb packaging, and the fedora SPEC?

Now that the changes are merged, the plan is to start moving them over
to fedora.spec and debian packaging respectively.  I'll have to switch
the compat conditionals in the deb packaging such that it achieves the
same requirement on already released distros.

For the fedora.spec, it would probably be wise to run rpmlint over the
new spec file (something Nathan hinted to me earlier).  So I'll be doing
that as well and keeping the output in mind when submitting those
changes on list.  Any other thoughts on potential gotcha's are (as
always) greatly appreciated.

Thanks again for your thoughts and review!

Cheers,

Lukas

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>