| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Bug 1106] pmdalinux / pmdaroot container problems |
| From: | bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:06:22 +0000 |
| Auto-submitted: | auto-generated |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <bug-1106-835@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/bugzilla/> |
| References: | <bug-1106-835@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/bugzilla/> |
Mark Goodwin
changed
bug 1106
Comment # 1
on bug 1106
from Mark Goodwin
some progress - in a container, the NET_ADDR_INDOM (using ioctl(fd, SIOCGIFCONF, ..) is the same namespace as the host not of the container, but the NET_DEV_INDOM maps to the net namespace in the container (exported as /proc/net/dev). So in a container, network.interface.net_addr (and related metrics) have different instances to the rest of the network.interface metrics. I'm not sure if this matters, unless there is somewhere in the code that expects the two indoms to have the same set of instances. This could just be a kernel bug or anomaly since SIOCGIFCONF doesn't honour the net namespace, but /proc/net/dev does. Haven't seen any EPERM issues - maybe that was a different bug, now fixed (IIRC we fixed a bug sounding a bit similar a while back). You are receiving this mail because:
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Bug 1067] linux pmda does too much work for network.interface queries, bugzilla-daemon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates - qa fixup, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | [Bug 1106] New: pmdalinux / pmdaroot container problems, bugzilla-daemon |
| Next by Thread: | [Bug 1106] pmdalinux / pmdaroot container problems, bugzilla-daemon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |