| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint |
| From: | fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler) |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:27:36 -0400 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <55401179.90601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Ken McDonell's message of "Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:02:17 +1000") |
| References: | <87bnk0wzn5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <877ft59dmo.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <1344838118.4507317.1429675359315.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <87pp6n7u7g.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <55401179.90601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
kenj wrote: > [...] All the best ideas survive ... just checked and PCP 1.0 > released in 1995 contained the packages (for IRIX): pcp_server (now > apparently pcp-collection), pcp_client (now apparently pcp-monitor) > and pcp_share (common stuff like libpcp). FWIW the 'server' and 'client' nomenclature seems clearer to me. How about using 'pcp-collector-server' and 'pcp-monitor-clients' in the rpm names? Redundant but informative. - FChE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | POSIX version, Martins Innus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] POSIX version, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |