Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint

[Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hey,

Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> I've been toying with this idea a bit, and ended going with the two
>> packages (pcp-collection and pcp-monitor, respectively).  If one is
> Could we use the term "collector" rather than "collection"?  See e.g.
> PCPIntro(1) - 3rd and 4th paragraphs there - that terminology is used
> fairly extensively throughout the Users+Admins Guide book as well.

Ah, I mistyped that, it is already pcp-collector (not collection).

>> interested in installing every pcp package, wildcarding "pcp-*" will
>> work.
> Neat - always the exceptions to the rule though I guess, with python* &
> perl* module package naming conventions.

Yes, but those should get pulled in via package dependencies anyways, no?
At least with the pcp-pmda* packages I've create, they require the
proper perl/python pmda bindings.

Cheers,

Lukas