| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:02:17 +1000 |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <87pp6n7u7g.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <87bnk0wzn5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <877ft59dmo.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <1344838118.4507317.1429675359315.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <87pp6n7u7g.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 |
On 29/04/15 08:40, Lukas Berk wrote: ... I've been toying with this idea a bit, and ended going with the two packages (pcp-collection and pcp-monitor, respectively). If one is interested in installing every pcp package, wildcarding "pcp-*" will work. All the best ideas survive ... just checked and PCP 1.0 released in 1995 contained the packages (for IRIX): pcp_server (now apparently pcp-collection), pcp_client (now apparently pcp-monitor) and pcp_share (common stuff like libpcp). 8^)> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] JSON PMDA, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint, Lukas Berk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |