pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch] speed pmie startup

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch] speed pmie startup
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:30:36 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <00ce01d07e46$77350bc0$659f2340$@internode.on.net>
References: <852862416.3748569.1429589380945.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5536CD81.1070008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <670202791.5237429.1429755448032.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55385C8A.40403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <614087554.5255330.1429763218272.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55398121.8020608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1623245265.5889251.1429840298981.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <00ce01d07e46$77350bc0$659f2340$@internode.on.net>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQJFVXwLsV3iCBx4hVXCmAZtyeSboQGG411QAZnZ8xoB0/RJkALXzhx2AbByVVwBmJEcUZwZNUnQ2YL0lGU=
Thread-topic: speed pmie startup

----- Original Message -----
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nathan Scott [mailto:nathans@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Friday, 24 April 2015 11:52 AM
> > ...
> > In all my tests, the values were only ever going down (slightly), so I only
> > went with only decreasing the filter range.
> 
> OK ... your analysis trumps my wild arse guess.

Heh.

> > That may be because I aggressively reduced the timeout in test qa/312 - too
> > much so perhaps.  Does this change things...?
> 
> split the difference (sort of) ... pmsleep 1 seems to work for me ... do you
> wanna commit that, or should I?

I've got another couple of commits pending here, I'll roll this in with them.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>