Re: [patch] speed pmie startup

[Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 23/04/15 14:26, Nathan Scott wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On 23/04/15 12:17, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > ...
> > > The 518 fix was in the original patch, but 260 hasn't been failing here at
> > > all so far - can you send me the .bad file?
> > Grrr ... 260 is not failing here now!
> I've run it in a loop & managed to hit it - looks like its as you suggested, the
> values from pmie look very close, just the acceptable range needs to be widened
> on one side of the equation to accommodate the quicker startup.
>
> Will fix shortly, thanks.
Not sure we're on the right path here.

1. if pmie starts sooner, the number of samples should be larger, not 
smaller ... so in qa/260 expecting a value of 180, finding a value of 
172 or 175 does not sound like a filter change is the right fix
2. qa/312 is failing for me now and the pmie rule is never being evaluated

I suspect (but have not found yet) some early rule firing that is no 
longer working with the 1 sec delays at start removed ... more 
investigation needed, me thinks.