| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] speed pmie startup |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:26:58 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <55385C8A.40403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <852862416.3748569.1429589380945.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5536CD81.1070008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <670202791.5237429.1429755448032.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55385C8A.40403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | Kkqyy4VSASavHyxscfOZaGv93Zwjvg== |
| Thread-topic: | speed pmie startup |
----- Original Message ----- > On 23/04/15 12:17, Nathan Scott wrote: > > ... > > The 518 fix was in the original patch, but 260 hasn't been failing here at > > all so far - can you send me the .bad file? > > Grrr ... 260 is not failing here now! > I've run it in a loop & managed to hit it - looks like its as you suggested, the values from pmie look very close, just the acceptable range needs to be widened on one side of the equation to accommodate the quicker startup. Will fix shortly, thanks. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] speed pmie startup, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: pcp updates: qa, pmie, pmiostat, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] speed pmie startup, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch] speed pmie startup, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |