| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Bug/Issue tracker |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Apr 2015 22:36:30 +1000 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <681874759.4524910.1429676595258.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20150420174712.GH18943@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5536B493.5070208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <681874759.4524910.1429676595258.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 |
On 22/04/15 14:23, Nathan Scott wrote: ... Well the opportunity if before us right now to resolve this since Michele is offering to do the work of consolidating the two - is there any reason why "hard core" issues couldn't be tracked in github instead? No objection from me ...I don't particularly like bugzilla and a quick tyre kick of github's issues service seems pretty basic but probably OK, except for the lack of any file upload and attach to an issue ... which could be a real pain for us with log files. Also we are already seeing pull requests on github so we need to think about encouraging this and how we'll manage these with the oss trees and the local repos of the hard core PCP developers. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: pmmgr, pmwebd, Frank Ch. Eigler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Hotproc fixes, Marko Myllynen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Bug/Issue tracker, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bug/Issue tracker, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |