| To: | "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: papi qa issue |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Mar 2015 06:53:13 +1100 |
| Cc: | 'PCP' <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20150306211739.GG27936@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <007d01d057ed$6de34160$49a9c420$@internode.on.net> <y0msidi5k2y.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <00a901d0584a$1a1ac2d0$4e504870$@internode.on.net> <20150306202631.GF27936@xxxxxxxxxx> <00b601d0584e$78397830$68ac6890$@internode.on.net> <20150306211739.GG27936@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 |
On 07/03/15 08:17, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: ... Yeah, the papi-tools weren't always packaged with older debian, though see <http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=papi-tools>. I've implemented a common check for papi-ness of a platform in common.check that avoids any dependence on papi-tools. And this works for the platforms that were failing the papi PMDA tests, and on the platforms where these tests were being run (real h/w none of this VM pretend nonsense), they still run and pass. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] new pdubuf vs. qa/367, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] PCP / RHEL 5 Update Issue, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: papi qa issue, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] papi qa issue, William Cohen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |