pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: interp3.c vs valgrind qa fallout

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: interp3.c vs valgrind qa fallout
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:07:14 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <54DA6391.2000405@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1786689886.2028682.1423566664005.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54DA6391.2000405@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: MN4bA3tbwkIoz4vOYrnQt7uW9C6+xg==
Thread-topic: interp3.c vs valgrind qa fallout

----- Original Message -----
> Yep.
> 
> My previous "fix" just morphed the valgrind errors, not removed them as
> I'd hoped ... in my tree there is an updated fix which I'm just giving
> some QA love before I advertise it as ready to be pushed.

Great, taa.

> Thanks and apologies.

No problem at all.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>