pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Containers analysis with PCP

To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Containers analysis with PCP
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:56:52 -0500 (EST)
Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20150210023410.GE25151@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <2100915892.5240937.1422867358164.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <768474811.5242777.1422867576642.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0m7fvr3tem.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <1602407544.1781133.1423528333125.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <20150210023410.GE25151@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: F1Yp78b57Cv+d9niURMvgQ/11O2mtw==
Thread-topic: Containers analysis with PCP

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> Please check closer.  Nothing appears to have changed about container
> naming policy or mechanism (pmdas still store it as char*'s,
> resolution still done repeatedly and ambiguously), which represented
> the bulk of the concern.

I understood your concern, but I was then and remain now unconvinced
of any genuine issues there.  Arguing about it then, as now, is sure
to be counter-productive, and time is precious.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>