pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Containers analysis with PCP

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Containers analysis with PCP
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:34:10 -0500
Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1602407544.1781133.1423528333125.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <2100915892.5240937.1422867358164.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <768474811.5242777.1422867576642.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0m7fvr3tem.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <1602407544.1781133.1423528333125.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Hi -


> >  Please don't forget to address earlier review comments in [1].
> 
> The review was ~2 weeks out of date when sent & the one/two issues there
> were fixed already, independently.  

It would have been helpful to note this contemporaneously.

> I see nothing needing further action there.

Please check closer.  Nothing appears to have changed about container
naming policy or mechanism (pmdas still store it as char*'s,
resolution still done repeatedly and ambiguously), which represented
the bulk of the concern.


> Feel free to revisit & reassess with current code (objectively,
> please - patches and QA tests will help you more than opinions about
> design docs)

(The absence of design docs/discussion is an objective fact.)


- FChE

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>