pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Containers analysis with PCP

To: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Containers analysis with PCP
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:58:45 -0500 (EST)
Cc: "pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx >> PCP" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <54D955EB.4040201@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <2100915892.5240937.1422867358164.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <768474811.5242777.1422867576642.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0m7fvr3tem.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <54D9447B.203@xxxxxxxxxx> <743115533.1781377.1423528533840.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54D955EB.4040201@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AUuXoDNsf8DOlZK5thzI2iCUEfN0+A==
Thread-topic: Containers analysis with PCP
Hi Mark,

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> see attached pminfo -f containers.name (it's pretty wordy)
> 

Do the containers.pid metrics reflect valid pids for the running containers?
Does pmcd.feature.containers metric have value 1?  If both look OK, I'll need
you to dig further into where things are going off the rails in the libpcp/
pmcd connection setup (stepping through with gdb & finding where ENOTSUPP is
coming from).

> >
> >> Also note: after upgrading to pcp-3.10.3 I had to manually Install the
> >> new root PMDA. Should it be auto-installed?
> >
> > It is auto-installed for new installations, and /etc/pcp/pmcd/pmcd.conf
> > falls under the usual RPM configuration file rules for an upgrade.
> 
> that's fine, but if the root PMDA is needed for container support to
> function, then we'll have an upgrade issue that'll need management (?)

Yep.  Any suggestions beyond what has already been done (the PMDA Install
and Remove scripts, default inclusion in pmcd.conf, and the how-to doc)?

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>