| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - fix pmlogextract regression |
| From: | Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:34:29 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <54B44556.3020603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20150112195401.BFECCFE6@bozo> <54B439D7.2050704@xxxxxxxxxx> <54B44556.3020603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 |
On 01/12/2015 05:06 PM, Ken McDonell wrote: Sorry, but I'm having trouble identifying which commits to cherry-pick. Can you spell it out for me?On 13/01/15 08:17, Dave Brolley wrote:Hey Ken, I pulled your changes, built and installed and then ran the 6 tests that you changed, but I'm, getting 3 of them failing. It looks like 177 and 251 are still generating the same output as before (i.e. not your new expected output) and I haven't yet figured out what's going on with 787. Are these tests passing for you?Sorry, only 961 is relevant to the pmlogextract code change. The others are WIP for the other interp.c problem I'm chasing down before I got sidetracked on pmlogextract issues.Disregard 177, 251 and 787 for the moment. Apologies for the distraction. Thanks, Dave |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - fix pmlogextract regression, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - fix pmlogextract regression, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - fix pmlogextract regression, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - fix pmlogextract regression, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |