pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] hotproc rfc

To: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] hotproc rfc
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 06:52:38 +1100
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <549865FA.6080300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <536D28B4.6010504@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1139662762.4765310.1399862104653.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54230FAF.2080201@xxxxxxxxxxx> <905561536.62723741.1412657864635.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5491CB2C.3060208@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1187598262.210622.1418885072122.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <549316B6.8010001@xxxxxxxxxxx> <952710162.849449.1418939335518.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <549865FA.6080300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
On 23/12/14 05:42, Martins Innus wrote:
Nathan,

On 12/18/14 4:48 PM, Nathan Scott wrote:
No worries & thanks.  Actually, not sure how I missed it yesterday but I
notice this morning that qa/185 is failing ... I probably wont get to it
today, if you could take a look into it that'd be awesome.  See attached.


Fixed here:

https://github.com/ubccr/pcp/tree/martins_working

Thanks Martins.

I've cherry picked this commit into my tree, and verified that qa/185 passes on at least one platform (it was failing on 85% of 'em previously).

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>