| To: | Martins Innus <minnus@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] hotproc rfc |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:48:55 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <549316B6.8010001@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <536D28B4.6010504@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1139662762.4765310.1399862104653.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54230FAF.2080201@xxxxxxxxxxx> <905561536.62723741.1412657864635.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5491CB2C.3060208@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1187598262.210622.1418885072122.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <549316B6.8010001@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | V2OGdWrj05XXwkvwMWZ726rVM/Bg2w== |
| Thread-topic: | hotproc rfc |
Hi Martins, ----- Original Message ----- > Nathan, > > On 12/18/14 1:44 AM, Nathan Scott wrote: > > OK, all merged now - I made some small tweaks, if you could double > > check those? I musta had a leftover hotproc.conf from earlier cos > > the test failed - updated to deal with that too. > > > Great, thanks for the cleanup! All looks good here. Will test over the > next few days. No worries & thanks. Actually, not sure how I missed it yesterday but I notice this morning that qa/185 is failing ... I probably wont get to it today, if you could take a look into it that'd be awesome. See attached. cheers. -- Nathan
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] hotproc rfc, Martins Innus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates: build, pmdapapi, Lukas Berk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] hotproc rfc, Martins Innus |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] hotproc rfc, Martins Innus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |