| To: | Martins Innus <minnus@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Dynamic metric rework |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:25:13 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5489F5D1.6050208@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5481E4D7.8050700@xxxxxxxxxxx> <991616924.12928901.1418084187235.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54876B8F.2050106@xxxxxxxxxxx> <428025601.13619915.1418163615228.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <548897F5.4010905@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1194215403.14908758.1418289588303.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5489F5D1.6050208@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | dxMY/xJlaDspB2DQiCt0JCxqxVEY7Q== |
| Thread-topic: | Dynamic metric rework |
Hi Martins, ----- Original Message ----- > [...] > OK, how about something like this? The first test is the actual > failure, the next 2 are contrived, the last is making sure there are > some dynamic metrics generated. I have made the assumption that there > should be at least 3 interrupts on any platform that the linux pmda runs > on. If it ends up failing somewhere, will need to be made conditional > on something ( architecture?). > > Test as well as good and bad files attached. Looking good! One gotcha to watch for is the "getdesc on" which will cause a DESC pdu to be sent, I think (you can use -Dpdu on dbpmda command line to verify that). cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pcp updates: pmdaproc, cgroups, books, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Add PMDA for the Unbound DNS resolver., Jan-Frode Myklebust |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Dynamic metric rework, Martins Innus |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Dynamic metric rework, Martins Innus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |