| To: | "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pcp updates: pmdaproc, cgroups, books |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:23:18 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20141212061823.GC14953@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1309338393.770280.1416292315684.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <1468616216.771853.1416292522829.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0mvbmc8kg9.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <1249426361.1589601.1416371161222.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <20141119181439.GF5700@xxxxxxxxxx> <1666386574.2247920.1416427865663.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <2132304544.16180073.1418360958577.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <20141212061823.GC14953@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | fjIURCwQakhgRbB1zM0dZAeJSK/a4g== |
| Thread-topic: | pcp updates: pmdaproc, cgroups, books |
----- Original Message ----- > Hi - > > > Ping? [...] > > As noted before, there was nothing unusual about my procfs > configuration. Your existing cgroups-root-001 tarball should show the > exact same problems. It was the test code that has been deficient > (not doing enough operations to hit the fd-leak/exhaustion limits, for > example), not the data. *sigh*, no - I'm looking to expand the testing coverage and you clearly had many more cgroups setup than I did & on a more recent kernel version where we have no test coverage yet. Ugh, its like pulling teeth - just forget about it, I'll do it myself when I get some time. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pcp updates: pmdaproc, cgroups, books, Frank Ch. Eigler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Dynamic metric rework, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pcp updates: pmdaproc, cgroups, books, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pcp updates: pmdaproc, cgroups, books, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |