pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pcp updates: pmdaproc, cgroups, books

To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: pcp updates: pmdaproc, cgroups, books
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:23:18 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20141212061823.GC14953@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1309338393.770280.1416292315684.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <1468616216.771853.1416292522829.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0mvbmc8kg9.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <1249426361.1589601.1416371161222.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <20141119181439.GF5700@xxxxxxxxxx> <1666386574.2247920.1416427865663.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <2132304544.16180073.1418360958577.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <20141212061823.GC14953@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: fjIURCwQakhgRbB1zM0dZAeJSK/a4g==
Thread-topic: pcp updates: pmdaproc, cgroups, books

----- Original Message -----
> Hi -
> 
> > Ping? [...]
> 
> As noted before, there was nothing unusual about my procfs
> configuration.  Your existing cgroups-root-001 tarball should show the
> exact same problems.  It was the test code that has been deficient
> (not doing enough operations to hit the fd-leak/exhaustion limits, for
> example), not the data.

*sigh*, no - I'm looking to expand the testing coverage and you clearly
had many more cgroups setup than I did & on a more recent kernel version
where we have no test coverage yet.   Ugh, its like pulling teeth - just
forget about it, I'll do it myself when I get some time.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>