pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Process analysis

To: Shirshendu Chakrabarti <shirshendu@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Process analysis
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:27:16 -0500
Cc: Nicolas Michel <be.nicolas.michel@xxxxxxxxx>, yves.weber@xxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CALg+gg=UpskZYxGyiCavtzD5tn5TC3KwNu9UQF=7z+MLJMCarw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAO5znat7ceWKn8wf0RKC=GNzagqv3dsa=r-zfFTL4MxgLeue9w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <y0mvbmjdoep.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <CALg+gg=UpskZYxGyiCavtzD5tn5TC3KwNu9UQF=7z+MLJMCarw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Hi -

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:00:24PM +0530, Shirshendu Chakrabarti wrote:

> This can be a probable solution. You can use systemtap to trace the
> desired process. [...]  Please see, AFAIK, there is no known
> integration with PCP for above solutions.

systemtap et al. are certainly possible sources of additional data for
PCP.  We're in the process of building out a richer systemtap-pcp
interface.  Do you have any more specific ideas about what new
per-process or intra-kernel statistics you need collected?

- FChE

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>