pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] hinv.*

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] hinv.*
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 01:48:33 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <544F2DD5.40108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20141021222355.GC6656@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <573592010.74725901.1413999659304.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54483934.4060802@xxxxxxxxxx> <20141023072636.GB6158@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1558759660.1356853.1414474824972.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <544F2DD5.40108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: 2CW8i9UdgqigTocQp7wlhjjRyQirWA==
Thread-topic: hinv.*

----- Original Message -----
> On 28/10/14 16:40, Nathan Scott wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, hmmm, thats a bit awkward - I don't really want us to have to
> > explicitly list each hinv metric in the logging configs.  Not sure
> > what else we can do though.
> 
> You can log hinv once (as we do today), _and_ add another clause to log
> hinv.something and hinv.otherthing with the default logging frequency.
> 
> I think that is manageable, unless I'm misunderstanding the issue.
> 

Ah, yes, that'll do the trick - thanks Ken.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>