When you've got to the bottom of this, could we please circle back to
understand why QA did not find this one?
There are 4 "iostat" QA tests: 366, 373, 536 and 842. All are passing on
all platforms in my QA Farm (which includes lots of CentOS and Fedora
variants).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pcp-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pcp-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Mark Goodwin
> Sent: Friday, 10 October 2014 2:48 PM
> To: Nathan Scott
> Cc: Bud Brown; Laurence Oberman; pcp
> Subject: Re: [pcp] iostat2pcp broken for iostat in RHEL/fedora
>
> On 10/10/2014 12:35 PM, Nathan Scott wrote:
> [ ... ]
> >> $ iostat -t -x 2 10 > iostat.10
> >> $ iostat2pcp iostat.10 iostat.pcp
> >> [26] Time: 03:49:59 PM
> >> Device: number of values? expected 12, found 3
> >
> > It looks like iostat2pcp doesn't understand this timestamp format, and
> > the parser is attempting to treat the line "Time: 03:49:59 PM"
> > as a set of device values. Is LC_TIME set in the environment when
> > iostat is being run?
>
> no. it fails on f19 too, with iostat v10, which is probably the same
version Bud
> is running.
>
>...
|