pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: process pmda

To: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: process pmda
From: Chandana De Silva <chandana@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:40:00 +1000
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <mailman.787.1411963858.4393.pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <mailman.787.1411963858.4393.pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: chandana@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ah, that explains it.

It had an easy way of keeping track of daemons, which could be leveraged
for into a simple pmie check.
Ok, we will stick to doing it the hard way via counting on the proc
pmda.

Thanks 


On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 23:10 -0500, pcp-request@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> The _process_ pmda has not been built/packaged for some time, as this
> comment in the source explains ...
>     
>         # This PMDA is only valid on platforms with a procfs
>         # It is also superceded by the cgroup functionality on Linux
>         # thus has not been built for some time, for reference only.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>