pcp
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [pcp] in search of pcpfans.git fche/pmwebd (graphite) branch review

from [Frank Ch. Eigler] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] in search of pcpfans.git fche/pmwebd (graphite) branch review
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:16:24 -0400
Cc: Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <268509410.52061205.1411078424416.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20140708004813.GF22029@xxxxxxxxxx> <704756615.50701778.1410922470036.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <20140918203331.GB8153@xxxxxxxxxx> <268509410.52061205.1411078424416.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i 
Hi -

> > Yup, and no, it is not backward compatible.  [...]
> 
> What is the resulting / user-observed behaviour when a new daemon
> is started with the existing configuration format?

The init script will fail when attempting to
   . $PMWEBDOPTS
with a syntax error. 

- FChE
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [pcp] in search of pcpfans.git fche/pmwebd (graphite) branch review, Nathan Scott
Next by Date:  Re: [pcp] in search of pcpfans.git fche/pmwebd (graphite) branch review, Nathan Scott
Previous by Thread:  Re: [pcp] in search of pcpfans.git fche/pmwebd (graphite) branch review, Nathan Scott
Next by Thread:  Re: [pcp] in search of pcpfans.git fche/pmwebd (graphite) branch review, Nathan Scott
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]