pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pmiostat qa failures

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pmiostat qa failures
From: Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:44:03 +1000
Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <540D316D.7060400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <540D316D.7060400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
On 09/08/2014 02:32 PM, Ken McDonell wrote:
I need help on this one from the pmiostat owner.

About half my hosts are failing qa/842.

.out.bad attached

This test does not apparently create a 842.full file, so I don't have any
additional info, e.g. the contents of $tmp.pmval and $tmp.pmiostat ... you may
want to include that as an enhancement.

Easy to reproduce, just ask.

I'll take a look, as the pmiostat author. I assume 'easy to repo' means
just run the QA test. Looking at your attached .bad, it looks like pmiostat
and pmval disagree for some (but not all) multiples of 4s update interval.
Any particular platforms worse than others? This all worked on my f19 system.

Regards
-- Mark

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>