----- Original Message -----
> On 07/08/14 09:43, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Hi Ken,
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> Changes committed to git://git.performancecopilot.org/kenj/pcp.git dev
> >> [...]
> >> qa/777 | 139 ++++++
> >> qa/777.out | 38 +
> >
> > This looks alot like qa/835 I added recently ... probably we should merge
> > 'em into one? I have noticed some occasional 835 flakiness where the
> > within_tolerance ranges are not met, so if yours is more robust in that
> > area, lets use it. There's shared pmda install/remove scripting now that
> > 835 uses, which 777 is open-coding - so merging the two tests seems the
> > best approach?
>
> Yep, sorry about that. I was working off the old email exchange between
> you and Chandana and had not noticed that 835 had been created.
>
> I'll merge 'em. But a couple of questions ...
>
> 1. should we use the perl probe (nothing extra to install) or nc(1) (may
> or may not be installed)?
Your perl implementation is fine by me.
> 2. I don't know enough about "slabs" for memcache to know if the stats
> from "stats slabs" and "stats items" are genuinely interesting ... the
> PMDA does not currently expose this AFAICT.
Yeah, not sure either - it looks interesting, but I was hoping Chandana
would be able to advise based on actual use in a real memcache environment.
thanks.
--
Nathan
|