pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [pcp] pcp updates - pmview

To: "'Mark Goodwin'" <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>, <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [pcp] pcp updates - pmview
From: "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 20:36:56 +1000
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <53E1855D.1040407@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <53BDCDB7.8030500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <53E1855D.1040407@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQIoY/q5mp4n0tFhAYp7o93CC15dyQJOM7uCmv+KBeA=
I missed the man pages, thanks Mark.

I've added them now.  The code matches pmview+, e.g. "pipe" is inclided in
the scene description language.

If anyone is really interested in the old man pages are still available from
SGI, e.g.
http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?cmd=getdoc&coll=0650&;
db=man&fname=1%20pmview
http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?cmd=getdoc&coll=0650&;
db=man&fname=1%20opmview

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Goodwin [mailto:mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 August 2014 11:31 AM
> To: Ken McDonell; pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates - pmview
> 
> On 07/10/2014 09:18 AM, Ken McDonell wrote:
> > [...]
> > Well this was one of the last pieces released by SGI to open source
> > and has been languishing for sometime ...
> 
> Hi Ken, was this from git://oss.sgi.com/markgw/pcp/pcp-new-open-
> source.git
> which has indeed been languishing, for about 5 years! The man pages are
> also included in the above repo but don't seem to be included in your
initial
> check-in? Also, the pmview.1 and .4 man pages are missing in that repo,
but
> pmview+.1 and .4 are present - do you or anyone, remember if pmview and
> pmview+ were in fact separate beasts?
> 
> If they were separate, it might be worth finding someone inside SGI to see
if
> they can dig out the pmview.[14] man pages since re-writing them from
> scratch would be an ordeal.
> 
> Cheers
> -- Mark


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>