pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Nanosecond event tracing timestamps

To: David Arnold <davida@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Nanosecond event tracing timestamps
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 19:21:25 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <7EE2C8DA-FA94-456D-B803-4C4972A38D56@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <370862218.22704206.1407114976924.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <53DF6F16.5070201@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7EE2C8DA-FA94-456D-B803-4C4972A38D56@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: Cfzm8t/dlxVW7ElaFIPBxDDQvzIPxQ==
Thread-topic: Nanosecond event tracing timestamps

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> I thought I'd elaborate a little, because I can appreciate that it might
> seem like supporting nanosecond resolution is unnecessary.
> [...]
> Obviously not something that's urgent, but perhaps of more medium-term
> interest for at least one small group of potential PCP users.

Thanks David, really interesting insights.  It doesn't look like it will
be particularly difficult to implement this support too, so unless someone
else tackles it before me I'll try to find time to get this done over the
next few weeks (one of several neat projects/ideas that came out of PyCon
Au this year - a worthwhile trip!).

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>