| To: | David Arnold <davida@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Nanosecond event tracing timestamps |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Aug 2014 19:21:25 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <7EE2C8DA-FA94-456D-B803-4C4972A38D56@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <370862218.22704206.1407114976924.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <53DF6F16.5070201@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7EE2C8DA-FA94-456D-B803-4C4972A38D56@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | Cfzm8t/dlxVW7ElaFIPBxDDQvzIPxQ== |
| Thread-topic: | Nanosecond event tracing timestamps |
----- Original Message ----- > [...] > I thought I'd elaborate a little, because I can appreciate that it might > seem like supporting nanosecond resolution is unnecessary. > [...] > Obviously not something that's urgent, but perhaps of more medium-term > interest for at least one small group of potential PCP users. Thanks David, really interesting insights. It doesn't look like it will be particularly difficult to implement this support too, so unless someone else tackles it before me I'll try to find time to get this done over the next few weeks (one of several neat projects/ideas that came out of PyCon Au this year - a worthwhile trip!). cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Secure Client/Server Features Confusion, Dave Brolley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Secure Client/Server Features Confusion, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Nanosecond event tracing timestamps, David Arnold |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] minimal install not-as-root, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |