| To: | Martin Spier <mspier@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Combined metrics with PCP_DERIVED_CONFIG |
| From: | fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler) |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:42:39 -0400 |
| Cc: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <CAEp4+dXXaugyCsqJm56z6SMCGJTVWM1ZtZvc5TLnGCvaTic-JA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Martin Spier's message of "Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:26:18 -0700") |
| References: | <CAEp4+dUo5sQJU=5MyXmfOiXmTSGA13_vHkb8nCbGmLyj28gwDQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <53D16827.5010600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAEp4+dXXaugyCsqJm56z6SMCGJTVWM1ZtZvc5TLnGCvaTic-JA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
mspier wrote: > [...] As of now, I need to fetch two metrics, kernel.all.cpu.sys and > kernel.all.cpu.user, each returning a separate data structure and > combine them. [...] And what I'm hoping to achieve is something > like this: [...] ... to create a new metric with a indexed instance domain. Sorry, I don't think the current pmRegisterDerived(3) implementation allows that. (Perhaps code for parsing the separate metrics would be well-spent investment anyway. That's because eventually, you'll likely need other metrics that can't be squished into a single instance-domained derived one due to differences in type/scale.) - FChE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Combined metrics with PCP_DERIVED_CONFIG, Martin Spier |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: systemtap/pcp integration, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Combined metrics with PCP_DERIVED_CONFIG, Martin Spier |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [pcp] Combined metrics with PCP_DERIVED_CONFIG, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |