pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Some recent QA regressions

To: Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Some recent QA regressions
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:35:33 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: PCP Mailing List <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <53C5895E.4030806@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <2129401188.6256039.1404891527704.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <53C01477.6000703@xxxxxxxxxx> <1170491276.9256269.1405303222288.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <53C4214F.4030405@xxxxxxxxxx> <1230657559.9961169.1405373957737.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <53C5895E.4030806@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: TWPiQmGEce0xnuYsJZcKMDcvyXkAsg==
Thread-topic: Some recent QA regressions

----- Original Message -----
> On 07/14/2014 05:39 PM, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Could we verify the state of each host identifier returned using dig and
> > dig -x?  IOW, checking that those which can be resolved, are (comparing
> > libpcp and dig output), and those which cannot are not (pmfind vs dig -x)
> >
> brolley/dev in pcpfans ....
> 

Works perfectly :) - thanks Dave.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>