| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pcp 3.9.5 build failure on ia64 & suse |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:21:06 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <074a01cf91ba$b3a9ada0$1afd08e0$@internode.on.net> |
| References: | <04d301cf912d$fb482980$f1d87c80$@internode.on.net> <1601784038.34470385.1403828681147.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <1907775487.34476034.1403832030935.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <074a01cf91ba$b3a9ada0$1afd08e0$@internode.on.net> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | AQK3Mo2JT9Ip6Xcd2hwMC5uPd+Go/QJ7uoGzAZggXTuZlHCXEKZYK6SG |
| Thread-topic: | pcp 3.9.5 build failure on ia64 & suse |
Hi Ken, ----- Original Message ----- > [...] > The rpm version is 4.4.2.3 on the ia64 build machine. > > Commenting out the BuildArch line lets Makepkgs run to completion ... rpms > built and installed. > > Is there some magic predefined macro in rpm-land that already provides the > rpm version number that is the missing piece of the spell needed to fix this > permanently? > I had a look but couldn't find RPM version info as spec %variables. pcp.spec is built in build/rpm/GNUmakefile, so I guess $(RPMBUILD) --version could be split apart and used? cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [pcp] pcp 3.9.5 build failure on ia64 & suse, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp grafana and graphite - How to convert pcp metric values into percent, Amer Ather |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [pcp] pcp 3.9.5 build failure on ia64 & suse, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | New perfevent PMDA, White, Joseph |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |