pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Service advertising versus QA

To: Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Service advertising versus QA
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 20:07:28 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5388DA90.5000803@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <410753304.16136418.1401248705845.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5386075A.70505@xxxxxxxxxx> <1726157269.16845669.1401321783766.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <53873F4B.8030208@xxxxxxxxxx> <1086317405.17579957.1401434621463.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5388DA90.5000803@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: zMtchJS7rUFyA+zMc2Pee8eekFJ62g==
Thread-topic: Service advertising versus QA

----- Original Message -----
> Your changes to 775 and 946 look good. So good that I stole them for 766
> and 776 :-)
> 
> I also changed 766 and 776 to use pminfo in order to obtain the address
> of an active interface. Pushed to brolley/dev on pcpfans as

Looks good (no need to check for pminfo btw - the sky has fallen in if
that cannot be found, & a huge number of tests would fail).

> > [...]
> > finds *something*/*anything*?  Otherwise we repeat ourselves(?), and as
> > more and more mechanisms come along, pmfind is going to get more and
> > more expensive...?
> I can see this being a global option and a companion to the pending
> timeout option.

*nod*

> There are probably users who want any result and would
> be satisfied with the first one (the qa tests themselves could benefit
> from this) and others who want the full results. The also-pending
> callback will be another way for users to consume the output as it is
> discovered. Combining all of these will certainly yield a wide range of
> ways to use the API and the tool.

Agreed, sounds good to me - thanks Dave.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Service advertising versus QA, Nathan Scott <=