| To: | Stan Cox <scox@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tom Yearke <tyearke@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Patch for Python's pmExtractValue Function |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:42:32 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <53446B81.4020602@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <53342449.7070602@xxxxxxxxxxx> <53446B81.4020602@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | zSSXPdwCLDu48dHVEfJtpPoRaqVGcg== |
| Thread-topic: | Patch for Python's pmExtractValue Function |
Hi guys, ----- Original Message ----- > I am not absolutely certain about the Python 2.6+ availability > requirement so I think this will do things in a similar 2.5 supported > way. Does this work for you? > We're a day or two out from a release, any help I can offer here? Do we have a reproducible test case I can try out, demonstrating the problem? (perhaps a little py script I can use, and then add a bit of valgrind sauce via /usr/bin/python to observe the leak?) thanks! -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] pmlogger -u questions, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] pmlogger -u questions, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Patch for Python's pmExtractValue Function, Stan Cox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Patch for Python's pmExtractValue Function, Tom Yearke |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |