pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: signal pmlogger

To: "'Frank Ch. Eigler'" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: signal pmlogger
From: "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:35:44 +1000
Cc: "'Martins Innus'" <minnus@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <y0mha5z5t4v.fsf@xxxxxxxx>
References: <53482BC5.6070203@xxxxxxxxxxx> <y0mr453663h.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <01c401cf55c9$d4322fc0$7c968f40$@internode.on.net> <y0mha5z5t4v.fsf@xxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQFjOOwECeWAyGg9kCExpCCyzl4RFwLbJ7mVAiOVnP0BW5en4ZuyiQtA
Frank notes ...

> Note that pmie has no native idea about which pmlogger process (amongst
> many locally or conceivably on a network) might be appropriate to target a
> with a pmlc connection.

Correct.  I said it was low-level plumbing ... 8^)>

But in lots of cases that matter the pmlogger of interest is easily
identified, especially when it is known to be the primary pmlogger on a
particular host.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>