pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] bug in python pmGetArchiveEnd()

To: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] bug in python pmGetArchiveEnd()
From: Jonathan Lim <jlim@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:12:12 -0700
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1604716078.4187743.1395616184247.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20140322015602.GA21741@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <328821978.4187531.1395615936648.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <1604716078.4187743.1395616184247.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 07:09:44PM -0400, Nathan Scott wrote:
>
> Can you make use of the code from  git://oss.sgi.com/pcp/pcp  and
> resend your patch against that?  (other than that your patch looks
> fine to be merged, along with the QA patch I've attached).

Thanks, Nathan.  I've attached a new diff against the git source.
Regarding pmGetArchiveLabel(), I was looking at an older version,
so yes, the loglabel argument has been removed.

Jonathan

Attachment: pmapi-py-pmGetArchiveEnd.patch
Description: Text Data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>