Re: [pcp] pmlogger_daily question/patch

[Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
> Don't think there is a better way, Martins.  The requirement has not been
> raised before (which is why the merge is unconditional), but your use case
> seems entirely reasonable.
> 
> I'll take ownership of moving this into the source tree, [...]

Heh, I was hoping you'd say that :) -- thanks!!!

> The only (!) issues will be fallout on the other pmlogger_daily tasks when
> the unmerged archives appear in the archive directories (there is a bunch of
> pattern matching that goes on here in the selection of files to cull and
> optionally compress (not a requirement in your case, I expect)) and a man
> page update and QA coverage and fallout ... so the patch solves the easy 25%
> ....

*nod*

cheers.

--
Nathan