| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] PCP Updates: qa fallout from ipv6/unix sockets for pmlogger and pmlc |
| From: | Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:26:40 -0500 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1679311501.13409718.1392938667397.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <52FE5058.4030702@xxxxxxxxxx> <53023D4E.1060504@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0mmwhoqu69.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <757832688.10280462.1392753861578.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <896174788.10421447.1392770006295.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5304D039.9010708@xxxxxxxxxx> <1347098955.12246278.1392874951684.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <530612EC.8020206@xxxxxxxxxx> <1679311501.13409718.1392938667397.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
On 02/20/2014 06:24 PM, Nathan Scott wrote: Yeah 750 fails for me in this manner. I have no other qa regressions from these changes.Hi Dave, Mhmmm, is test 750 passing for you atm? :) I accidentally included my hostname in its output, so it should be failing everywhere else. Sorry 'bout that - will be fixed shortly ... but do you have any other common failures though? (that fail without these new changes, I mean). Dave |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] pmlc access control, was Re: PCP Updates: qa fallout from ipv6/unix sockets for pmlogger and pmlc, Dave Brolley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | PCP Updates: pmlogger AF_UNIX socket for normal users; qa version check bump, Dave Brolley |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] PCP Updates: qa fallout from ipv6/unix sockets for pmlogger and pmlc, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | pmie - privileged use, Chandana De Silva |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |