| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pcp updates - mostly pmie |
| From: | "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:04:56 -0500 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5302691A.9090100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5301AE80.6060703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <y0md2ilsrhf.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <5302691A.9090100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
Hi, Ken - > >I find the logfile names useful in that context; perhaps the other > >programs can be made consistent with that instead? > > I don't have a strong preference. Likewise. > I (weakly) favour the terse format on the basis that the vast > majority of users don't care, and the few that do already know that > pmwebd and pmmgr are part of Performance Co-Pilot (Yeah, the "Performance Co-Pilot" string could be elided or abbreviated.) > and know where to find the log files. Probably (though we're about to get an influx of new users). > Let's decide (not sure how) [...] Have a coin? I call tails. :-) - FChE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pcp updates - mostly pmie, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: pcp updates - mostly pmie, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pcp updates - mostly pmie, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pcp updates - mostly pmie, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |