| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pmmgr pmlogger default behaviour |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:29:36 +1100 |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1095368295.6085212.1392272562364.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <2108905700.15892281.1391033827018.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <1583484726.15908616.1391037005341.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <20140130181134.GA7584@xxxxxxxxxx> <1178788786.16735370.1391119719356.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0mob2l2e67.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <1557539857.20737008.1391680756568.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <20140206133220.GC5017@xxxxxxxxxx> <633105491.21839148.1391757935531.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <1095368295.6085212.1392272562364.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
On 13/02/14 17:22, Nathan Scott wrote: Hi Frank, ----- Original Message -----...I'll stew on this over the weekend, and attempt to come up with some possible directions forward for us here, seeking compromise. It feels a bit like we're going in circles by email here now, and we need a new tack as we're stale-mated on each others needs/concerns. Is this the trigger for a PCP developer's conference call/meeting? We haven't had one in quite a while. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Possible pmmgr issue?, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | debian package installation failure, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pmmgr pmlogger default behaviour, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pmmgr pmlogger default behaviour, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |